Supreme Virtue
June 28, 2002 -- No. 141
The Justice Chronicle,
provided by Soka Gakkai International-USA, is a free monthly
e-mail in support of the Soka Spirit movement. Soka Spirit
is the SGI's educational effort to create value and deepen
our understanding of Nichiren Buddhism through increased
awareness of issues surrounding the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood
and the spiritual foundation of the SGI movement.
1) A JOURNEY OF FAITH WITHIN: THE SEARCH FOR HAPPINESS OUTSIDE LEADS TO UNHAPPINESS INSIDE
In this serialized article, which appears in the June issue of Living
Buddhism, SGI-USA Study Department Vice Leader Shin Yatomi revisits the
issue of pilgrimage, and discusses the meaning of faith in the
Dai-Gohonzon.
THE SUPREME VIRTUE FOR A BELIEVER LIES IN FAITH IN THE LAW
The current Nichiren Shoshu priesthood, led by High Priest Nikken,
promotes absolute faith in and strict obedience to the High Priest
(Dai-Nichiren: The Correct Way of Faith in Nichiren Shoshu, special
edition, pp. 13-14) -- a teaching that was never intended by Nichiren
Daishonin and Nikko Shonin. The priesthood claims: Even if one
possesses a traditional Gohonzon, if the person worshipping it slanders
the High Priest¸there will be no benefit ([Nichiren Shoshu publication]
100 Questions and Answers, p. 15). Put simply, the priesthood regards
our obedience to the high priest as more important than our faith in
the Gohonzon.
The priesthood also declares: The supreme fundamental principle of
Nichiren Buddhism is that it is indeed because we obey the instruction
of the High Priest, the only person upon whom the Heritage of the Law
has been bestowed and to whom it has been entrusted, that Nichiren
Buddhism is correctly transmitted to us. Faith in Nichiren Shoshu means
keeping a strict watch over slander, and we must always know that it is
only the High Priest, the protector of the Heritage of the Law, who can
judge whether or not the manner of teaching and the contents of a
teaching are consonant with Nichiren Buddhism, and it is he who judges
what is correct and incorrect. It follows that if a person is shown
that he has made an error by the priesthood, the fundamental attitude
of faith in Nichiren Shoshu is one through which that person sincerely
repents of and confesses his error, and thereby eradicates the wrong
(Dai-Nichiren: The Circumstances Surrounding the Soka Gakkai Problem,
special edition, p. 21).
According to Nichiren Shoshu, the high priest is the only person who
can understand the Daishonin's writings. The paramount concern for
believers, therefore, lies not in their seeking and studying the
Daishonin's teachings, but in their obedience to the high priest. Once
a believer is found guilty of slander by the priesthood, his or her
only recourse is to
epent
and confess. The supreme virtue for a believer, according to Nichiren
Shoshu, lies in obedience to the high priest, and thus the greatest sin
is to disobey him.
These views contradict the Daishonin's fundamental teaching, as he
states: What is most important is that, by chanting Nam-myoho-renge-kyo
alone, you can attain Buddhahood. It will no doubt depend on the
strength of your faith. To have faith is the basis of Buddhism (The
Writings of Nichiren Daishonin, p. 832). Contrary to the priesthood's
claim, the Daishonin clearly states here that the supreme virtue for a
believer lies in faith in the Law and in the realization of one's
supreme potential of Buddhahood. Obedience to religious authority
belongs to Nichiren Shoshu, but not to the Buddhism of Nichiren
Daishonin.
Furthermore, the Daishonin stresses believers' practice and study as
expressions of and sustenance for faith in the Gohonzon: Believe in the
Gohonzon, the supreme object of devotion in all of Jambudvipa. Be sure
to strengthen your faith¸. Exert yourself in the two ways of practice
and study. Without practice and study, there can be no Buddhism (WND,
p. 386). These statements by the Daishonin, and many more like them,
make clear that our faith in the Gohonzon, supported by individual
practice and study, is the foundation of his Buddhism. Nowhere in his
writings does he state that our absolute faith in and strict obedience
to the High Priest are essential to our happiness.
The priesthood's attempt to subordinate faith in the Gohonzon to
obedience to the high priest -- thereby obscuring the essential
teaching of the Daishonin's Buddhism -- clearly amounts to slander of
the Law. When we recognize this transgression against Buddhism, it is
important to withdraw our support from those who promote it. In this
regard, the Daishonin says: It is the way of the great devil to assume
the form of a venerable monk¸. Whatever they may say, however cleverly
they may try to deceive you into discarding the Lotus Sutra, do not
assent to it (WND, 81). Here the Daishonin warns us that the influence
of authority, especially that of clergy, often works to dissuade us
from faith in the Gohonzon, which is the Lotus Sutra of the Latter Day
of the Law. The Daishonin urges us neither to condone nor to support
such a negative influence.
Three in a series.
2) THE SAME REASON NOW AND THEN: IS THE SGI CONTRADICTING ITS PAST STANCE TOWARD THE HIGH PRIEST AND PILGRIMAGE?
This article appears in the June issue of Living Buddhism.
Currently, Nichiren Shoshu does not allow SGI members, at least
officially, on the grounds of the head temple. The priesthood, however,
has been long promoting SGI members to join the temple's parish by
stressing the benefit of praying directly to the Dai-Gohonzon or by
condemning one's unwillingness to visit the head temple not only as a
sign of apostasy but also as a cause for karmic retribution. For
example, the priesthood asserts: If you don't know the source, or don't
seek to understand the source, you may become arrogant and unable to
attain enlightenment. This is the reason for tozan as a fundamental
practice in True Buddhism. In Nichiren Shoshu, the source of faith and
benefit is the Dai-Gohonzon, found at the Head Temple, Taiseki-ji (The
Group Tozan Handbook, p. 3). The priesthood also claims: However, if
one's faith becomes cut off from the Dai-Gohonzon of the High Sanctuary
and from the teaching of the lifeblood of the entity of the Law, then
no matter how sincerely one chants to the Gohonzon in one's own home,
there will be no benefit. On the contrary it will only result in the a
ccumulation of negative karma (100 Questions and Answers, p. 4).
It is true that before the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood excommunicated
the SGI in 1991, the SGI had long supported the high priest and
stressed pilgrimage to the head temple widely among its membership.
After the excommunication, however, the SGI has been publicly pointing
out High Priest Nikken's distortion of Nichiren Daishonin's Buddhism,
and it now discourages its members from going to the head temple.
Is the SGI contradicting itself? Not at all. Up until 1991, the SGI
respected and supported the high priest based on one essential
assumption: that the office of high priest is vested with the
responsibility to protect the integrity of the Daishonin's Buddhism and
the believers who are sincerely working to spread it widely. The SGI
believed that the successive high priests had done so to the best of
their ability, despite their occasional frailties.
In 1991, however, this basic assumption and trust of the priesthood was
betrayed when the priesthood unilaterally acted to disband the SGI,
culminating in its excommunication in November of that year. The
priesthood, furthermore, started to promote a doctrine of absolute
faith in and strict obedience to the High Priest in order to silence
any criticism (Dai-Nichiren: The Correct Way of Faith in Nichiren
Shoshu, special edition, pp. 13Â14).
Clearly this absolute authority of the high priest derived neither from
the Daishonin nor Nikko Shonin, both of whom always stressed Buddhist
teachings themselves rather than clerical authority.
When the high priest seemed to be trying to fulfill his responsibility,
the SGI supported him. When the head temple was not actively opposing
the spread of the Daishonin's Buddhism, the SGI promoted pilgrimage.
Now the high priest and the rest of the priesthood not only neglect
their responsibility but also act in opposition to it. The SGI,
therefore, does not support the high priest in his attempt to distort
the Daishonin's teaching, nor does it promote pilgrimage to the head
temple in support of the priesthood's aim to further disseminate its
misleading teaching.
The Daishonin stressed the integrity of Buddhism as the basis of our
Buddhist practice. As he wrote, Since the Buddha preached in his last
testament to rely on the Law, not the person, you must not believe in
anyone who does not preach according to the sutra, no matter how
eminent he may be (Gosho Zenshu, p. 9). Foreseeing the possibility of
doctrinal error by the high priest, Nikko Shonin also wrote, Do not
follow even the high priest if he goes against the Buddha's Law and
propounds his own views (GZ, 1618). In his warning against a high
priest's erroneous views must have been his wish to protect the office
of high priest from the high priest himself.
The SGI supported the high priest and promoted pilgrimage to the head
temple because of its commitment to protect the integrity of the
Daishonin's teaching. Now, exactly for the same reasons, the SGI
condemns the high priest's error and discourages pilgrimage to the head
temple, which the priesthood uses to support the high priest's
erroneous teaching. The SGI followed the teachings of the Daishonin and
Nikko Shonin before 1991 in its support of the high priest and
pilgrimage, because that equated to protecting the Daishonin's Buddhism
and its wide spread. Since 1991 the SGI is still following the
teachings of the Daishonin and Nikko Shonin in its opposition to
pilgrimage and the high priest, who has turned against Buddhism. The
SGI may seem to be taking an opposite course of action then and now,
but the reason behind its stance toward the priesthood has been the
same all along†protecting the Daishonin's Buddhism and working to
spread it to the best of its ability.
SOKA SPIRIT IN THE PUBLICATIONS
This section highlights articles published in the World Tribune and Living Buddhism related to the Soka Spirit movement.
June Living Buddhism, page 40: Refuting the Pilgrimage of Nichiren
Shoshu: Selected Passages from Nichiren Daishonin's Writings is a
collection of quotes from the Daishonin that elucidate why going on
Nichiren Shoshu's pilgrimages goes against the Daishonin's intent.
